A proctor is somebody who supervises or
monitors in an educational setting. In the practice of medicine, proctorship is
somewhat more complicated. Comprehending the medical role of a proctor helps
clarify the legal risk of proctoring.
In medicine, a proctor objectively evaluates the clinical competence of some other doctor. Proctors are utilized in hospitals to evaluate or to assess new and existing staff members that are requesting enlarged or new privileges.
The proctor does not provide patient care, but is only an onlooker. Thus, the proctor does not establish a physician-patient relationship and does not have any financial connection to the patient.
Since the proctor has no physician-patient relationship or a relationship with the doctor being proctored, the legal system is reluctant to hold proctors liable if performance falls below the standard of care. But in the event the physician shifts from a proctor into more of a preceptor job, she or he could be found liable.
A preceptor is very different from a proctor. Preceptorship serves an educational and training function, not a monitoring function. New skills can be taught by preceptors and they do develop a physician-patient relationship. A preceptor would hold the principal responsibility for a patient's care.
The line between observation and participating can be hard for a proctor. If a proctor volunteers to participate in a process, their function could then shift into that of a preceptor and can unknowingly produce a doctor-patient relationship. There is legal precedent for a preceptor being held liable for failing to intercede in a patient's care.
Proctoring is a standard method for credentialing physicians and surgeons, nevertheless, if they would like to avoid medical malpractice accountability, they must not participate in the decision making regarding the procedure or the procedure itself. Crossing that line can lead to medical malpractice risk. To learn more regarding the legal risks connected with proctoring contact us!
In medicine, a proctor objectively evaluates the clinical competence of some other doctor. Proctors are utilized in hospitals to evaluate or to assess new and existing staff members that are requesting enlarged or new privileges.
The proctor does not provide patient care, but is only an onlooker. Thus, the proctor does not establish a physician-patient relationship and does not have any financial connection to the patient.
Since the proctor has no physician-patient relationship or a relationship with the doctor being proctored, the legal system is reluctant to hold proctors liable if performance falls below the standard of care. But in the event the physician shifts from a proctor into more of a preceptor job, she or he could be found liable.
A preceptor is very different from a proctor. Preceptorship serves an educational and training function, not a monitoring function. New skills can be taught by preceptors and they do develop a physician-patient relationship. A preceptor would hold the principal responsibility for a patient's care.
The line between observation and participating can be hard for a proctor. If a proctor volunteers to participate in a process, their function could then shift into that of a preceptor and can unknowingly produce a doctor-patient relationship. There is legal precedent for a preceptor being held liable for failing to intercede in a patient's care.
Proctoring is a standard method for credentialing physicians and surgeons, nevertheless, if they would like to avoid medical malpractice accountability, they must not participate in the decision making regarding the procedure or the procedure itself. Crossing that line can lead to medical malpractice risk. To learn more regarding the legal risks connected with proctoring contact us!
No comments:
Post a Comment